This article originally appeared on artnet News.
The art world is no stranger to the gasp-inducing project or performance: in fact, it seems at times to thrive on it. In these dog days of summer, when the art world slows down and the tumbleweeds approach Chelsea, we’re excited to hear that provocative exhibitions are still taking place around the world.
In Tokyo, ASAKUSA gallery is showing “Radical Democracy,” which features the work of artists Thomas Hirschhorn and Santiago Sierra. Sierra, in particular, has gotten flack for recruiting menial laborers in his work, and paying them a small rate to tattoo them, dye their hair, or make them sit in cardboard boxes. It is the transparency of power that makes the audience uncomfortable. “Nothing has changed since the Middle Ages,” the Spanish artist told BOMB magazine in 2004. He continues, “Art is conceptual entertainment. Regardless of how radical it is, it has a great penetration on the market.”
Below are the last century’s 10 most controversial artworks to whet your scandal whistle, topped off with 15 honorable mentions. Has much changed since Marcel Duchamp’s “Fountain”?
1.Emma Sulkowicz, “Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight)” (2014–15)
Still making headlines today, Emma Sulkowicz’s enduring performance(begun in September 2014 as a thesis project) involved carrying a 50-pound mattress around with her wherever she went on New York City’s Columbia campus, where she was alleges she was raped by a fellow student in 2012. The artist promised the piece would end only if and when her supposed rapist was expelled from the university. He was not, so Sulkowicz carried the mattress onstage during her graduation ceremony to bring the performance to a close in May 2015 ― not before making a lasting impression on critics and the public alike.
2. Ryder Ripps, “ART WHORE” (2014)
After accepting the offer of a one-night artist’s residency at New York’s Ace Hotel, Ryder Ripps presented “ART WHORE,” a project in which he invited two escorts acquired through craigslist to join him in his hotel room. During their stay, Ripps documented Brooke and Jay after he instructed them to draw whatever they wished. Art F City writer Whitney Kimball described “ART WHORE” as being “in the running for the most offensive project of 2014.” Dazed’s Zing Tsjeng described it as “the same old story: a white dude co-opting someone else’s labor in his struggle to Make A Point. Nothing new about that.”
3. Guillermo Vargas, “Eres Lo Que Lees (You Are What You Read)” (2007)
Guillermo Vargas’ story is in a particularly sensitive vein, as it involves the supposedly-intentional starvation of an innocent animal. In an exhibition at Códice Gallery in Managua, Nicaragua, the artist bound a stray dog to the wall by a leash, leaving it without food or water. Spelled out above the animal were the words, “Eres Lo Que Lees,” Spanish for “You Are What You Read.” To add insult to injury, the phrase was made out of dog biscuits.
The gallery defended itself, claiming the dog was unchained and fed outside of exhibition hours, but that didn’t prevent international outrage or the death threats addressed to Vargas from streaming in. (Tom Otterness infamously shot a dog for art in 1977, but the incident did not become widely known until many years later, and the video footage has never been widely distributed.)
4. Chris Ofili, “The Holy Virgin Mary” (1996)
Though created in 1996, this now-infamous painting by Turner Prize winner Chris Ofili didn’t cause a stir until 1999, when it was scheduled to be shown in “Sensation,” a traveling group exhibition of YBA works bound for New York City’s Brooklyn Museum. The large painting depicts a black Virgin Mary and incorporates elephant dung as well as collaged pornographic images. Then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a devout Catholic, called the work “sick” and attempted to block the exhibition by cutting the museum’s funding. His request was denied by a federal judge, and the painting eventually went onto sell for $4.6 million at auction.
5. Tracey Emin, “Everyone I Have Ever Slept With” 1963-1995 (1995)
One can guess what might be controversial here based on the name of Tracey Emin’s work alone, but the title is actually misleading. Emin created a tent on which she appliquéd the 102 names of everyone she had slept with or beside, in either a sexual or platonic sense. Of the work, Emin said, “Some I’d had a shag with in bed or against a wall. Some I had just slept with, like my grandma. I used to lay in her bed and hold her hand. We used to listen to the radio together and nod off to sleep. You don’t do that with someone you don’t love and don’t care about.”
The work was later destroyed in an East London warehouse fire, along with over 100 other works owned by Charles Saatchi.
6. Guerrilla Girls, “Do Women Have to be Naked to get into the Met. Museum?” (1989)
Ever the art-world radicals, the Guerrilla Girls are an anonymous group of female artists that was formed in response to a 1984 painting and sculpture survey at New York’s Museum of Modern Art that included just 13 women out of a total of 169 artists. Thus began a poster campaign to raise awareness of the lack of women artists represented in major contemporary art establishments.
Though they pitched the above poster to the Public Art Fund for a New York billboard, the work was rejected, and in retaliation, the Guerrilla Girls rented space on New York City buses for the ad. In addition, they stealthily hung the posters around the city during the night, donning their signature gorilla masks to maintain anonymity.
7. Robert Mapplethorpe, “X Portfolio” (1989)
In June 1989 ― just a few months after his untimely death from AIDS ― a retrospective of over 150 of Robert Mapplethorpe’s works was due to open at the Corcoran Art Gallery in Washington, DC. However, the sexually explicit nature of the photographs, which featured sado-masochism and homosexuality, drew the wrath of Capitol Hill’s conservative lawmakers. In a misguided attempt to avoid controversy, the exhibition was canceled, adding fuel to the so-called “Culture Wars.”
In protest, Mapplethorpe supporters congregated outside the gallery on the evening of June 30, 1989, projecting giant images of his work onto the side of the building, creating a powerful and moving tribute to the late photographer.
8. Andres Serrano, “Piss Christ” (1987)
For more than two decades, Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ has been a polarizing work for its subject matter. The photograph of a plastic crucifix submerged in a cup of the artist’s urine has sparked controversy since its creation, but public anger came to a climax in 2011 in Avignon, France, when Catholic fundamentalists attempted to destroy the photograph with hammers.
“At the time I made Piss Christ, I wasn’t trying to get anything across,” Serrano told the Guardian in 2012. “In hindsight, I’d say ‘Piss Christ’ is a reflection of my work, not only as an artist, but as a Christian.” Oomph.
9. Richard Serra, “Tilted Arc” (1981)
Richard Serra’s 120-foot-long and 12-foot-high bend of Cor-Ten steel hardly seems like the description of a work that could induce the anger like that of medieval villagers with torches and pitchforks. But such was the case in 1981, when Serra erected his massive wall-like sculpture, bisecting New York City’s Federal Plaza.
Denounced for its placement in the middle of a busy pedestrian thoroughfare, it was seen as an annoying obstruction ― as a result, it was removed from the plaza in 1989, despite Serra’s intention that it would be permanent. “I don’t think it is the function of art to be pleasing,” he commented at the time. “Art is not democratic. It is not for the people.”
10. Marcel Duchamp, “Fountain” (1917)
Perhaps the most famous controversial work of all time, Marcel Duchamp’sFountain, arguably the first “readymade” in existence, wraps up our list. As a porcelain urinal turned upon its back, the piece was submitted under the pseudonym “R. Mutt” to the Society of Independent Artists, and was promptly excluded from the Society’s inaugural exhibition. Duchamp resigned from the board in protest.
In a 1964 interview, Duchamp—by then the known producer of the work—was quoted in the Paris-Express as saying, “I was drawing people’s attention to the fact that art is a mirage. A mirage, exactly like an oasis appears in the desert. It is very beautiful until, of course, you are dying of thirst. But you don’t die in the field of art. The mirage is solid.”
Honorable Mentions:
Laura Lima, “The Inverse” (2016)
Milo Moiré, “Mirror Box” (2016)
Paul McCarthy, “Tree” (2014)
Maurizio Cattelan, “All” (2012)
Martin Creed, “WORK NO. 227 THE LIGHTS GOING ON AND OFF” (2000)
Tracey Emin, “My Bed” (1998)
Marcus Harvey, “Myra” (1997)
Damien Hirst, “Mother & Child (Divided)” (1993)
Gran Fury, “Kissing Doesn’t Kill” (1990)
Dread Scott, “What is the Proper Way to Display a US Flag?” (1988)
David Hammons, “How Ya Like Me Now?” (1988)
David Wojnarowicz, “A Fire in My Belly” (1986–87)
Marina Abravomić, “Rhythm 0” (1974)
VALIE EXPORT, “TAP and TOUCH Cinema” (1968)
Diane Arbus, “Child with Toy Hand Grenade in Central Park” (1962)
Piero Manzoni, “Artist’s Shit” (1961)
Pablo Picasso, “Guernica” (1937)
Pablo Picasso, “Les Demoiselles d’avignon” (1907)
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
from Arts News on The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/2aguK9a
No comments:
Post a Comment